<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: agree to disagree</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/</link>
	<description>Funny Examples of Oxymorons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Black_sky_crimson_rain</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1525</link>
		<dc:creator>Black_sky_crimson_rain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 03:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1525</guid>
		<description>oxymoron=christian black metal band
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oxymoron=christian black metal band</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Burpzasg</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1522</link>
		<dc:creator>Burpzasg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 20:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1522</guid>
		<description>what is this</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what is this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrqburt</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrqburt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>because no one ever says agree to disagree they always say ?&quot;lets agree to disagree&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>because no one ever says agree to disagree they always say ?&#8221;lets agree to disagree&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrqburt</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1480</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrqburt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jan 2012 11:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1480</guid>
		<description>Not an oxymoron lets agree (now) to disagree  (to is a word which means future tense).  So one is not doing two things at one time they are saying one after the other!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not an oxymoron lets agree (now) to disagree  (to is a word which means future tense).  So one is not doing two things at one time they are saying one after the other!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GUEST</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1441</link>
		<dc:creator>GUEST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 21:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1441</guid>
		<description>agree to disagree ....while meeting the criteria of &quot;a figure of speech by which a locution produces an incongruous, seemingly self-contradictory effect&quot; is the only way to express the frustration of reasonable, rational individuals when confronted by beliefs and rationals of completely unreasonable and unrational individuals who only believe what they think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>agree to disagree &#8230;.while meeting the criteria of &#8220;a figure of speech by which a locution produces an incongruous, seemingly self-contradictory effect&#8221; is the only way to express the frustration of reasonable, rational individuals when confronted by beliefs and rationals of completely unreasonable and unrational individuals who only believe what they think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Schizophasia</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1431</link>
		<dc:creator>Schizophasia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Dec 2011 16:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1431</guid>
		<description>Everyone has made a good point but... something can not (be and not be) at the same time. A light switch only has an &#039;on or off&#039; it either is or it isn&#039;t. Realistically the context of the &quot;disagreement&quot; is the determining factor, as there are some things that are nonsensical and neither could know, which would make both parties full of B.S. Which is usually the case when this statement is made. 

People may be better served to just admit that they disagree and be done with it and spend the time in proving their case. Note that the truth needs no argument, no one will disagree that 2+2=4. 
 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone has made a good point but&#8230; something can not (be and not be) at the same time. A light switch only has an &#8216;on or off&#8217; it either is or it isn&#8217;t. Realistically the context of the &#8220;disagreement&#8221; is the determining factor, as there are some things that are nonsensical and neither could know, which would make both parties full of B.S. Which is usually the case when this statement is made. </p>
<p>People may be better served to just admit that they disagree and be done with it and spend the time in proving their case. Note that the truth needs no argument, no one will disagree that 2+2=4.<br />
 </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chag_all</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator>Chag_all</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2011 02:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1357</guid>
		<description>That would be the &quot;seed&quot; to a very boring way of  interacting  with people. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be the &#8220;seed&#8221; to a very boring way of  interacting  with people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harrypetersgill 1</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>Harrypetersgill 1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jul 2011 07:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve agreed to disagree</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve agreed to disagree</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 123</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1186</link>
		<dc:creator>123</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 07:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1186</guid>
		<description>it is NOT an oxymoron. it means both you and I agree that we do not see the issue in the same way. I agree that you disagree with me and you agree that I disagree with you = agree to disagree. 
most certainly NOT an oxymoron.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is NOT an oxymoron. it means both you and I agree that we do not see the issue in the same way. I agree that you disagree with me and you agree that I disagree with you = agree to disagree. <br />
most certainly NOT an oxymoron.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seimhin</title>
		<link>http://www.oxymoronlist.net/agree-to-disagree/comment-page-1/#comment-1134</link>
		<dc:creator>Seimhin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Apr 2011 08:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.oxymoronlist.net/?p=113#comment-1134</guid>
		<description>A pc [sic] person would never agree to disagree with anyone but a person with evidently superior talents and skills. pc [sic] people would spend the day forcing everyone to be nice. Now isn&#039;t that the seed of a new oxymoron?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A pc [sic] person would never agree to disagree with anyone but a person with evidently superior talents and skills. pc [sic] people would spend the day forcing everyone to be nice. Now isn&#8217;t that the seed of a new oxymoron?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

